TexasCHLforum.com

Gator Guy wrote: ↑Fri Mar 08, 2019 9:51 am

RicoTX wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:21 pm

K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:57 am

montgomery wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:41 am

Gator Guy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:30 am Unless somebody doesn't comply with NFA already, I'm skeptical they will start, no matter what other firearms fall under that unconstitutional un-law.

Non-compliance is a cowardly act in the absence of performing a patriot act.

Can someone explain to me what those two statements are supposed to mean in this context? I seriously do not get it.

I agree with gator guy.
Basically I think gator guy means if you already comply with the rules, chances are you will comply in the future regardless of the rules. In other words, you haven't fought back yet regarding 2a restrictions, why would anyone believe differently in the future?

I think what Montgomery is saying is that most people won't put their money (and freedom/life) where their mouth is... basically.

My interpretation.... apologies to both if I missed the mark.

You understood what I meant, but I can only speak for myself.

A lot of people in a lot of gun forums say they won't comply with a semi-auto ban. I think the percentage of online stalwarts who actually break bad if this passes will be lower than the percentage of people who actually follow through with a new year resolution for long term weight loss. Maybe I'm wrong, but there's only one way to prove it, and it doesn't involve more talking.