Search found 2 matches

by TexasJohnBoy
Thu May 18, 2017 7:47 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: RIP - Fines for Signs
Replies: 63
Views: 14029

Re: RIP - Fines for Signs

Ruark wrote:Why does the Attorney General have to be involved in the first place? All this writing letters to the AG, waiting months and months for a reply, etc. is ridiculous. Seems like you should be able to simply report the offense to the appropriate law enforcement agency, and a fine is issued, period.
There's simply not enough red tape in your solution.
by TexasJohnBoy
Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:12 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: RIP - Fines for Signs
Replies: 63
Views: 14029

Re: RIP - Fines for Signs

mojo84 wrote:I've noticed a trend and not sure if it's just a recent trend or if I am just now noticing it. If someone, especially a legislator, doesn't 100% agree on 100% of the issues with a person, that legislator is worthless to that person and needs to be voted out of office. The same applies to laws. If a law isn't 100% effective, then it must be junk and worthless.

This is irrational and illogical rationale as there is no one or no law that is 100% in alignment with 100% of people's opinions. I have never found anyone I agree with 100% of the time on every issue. If that was my standard, I would be one miserable lonely man.

It is possible to disagree with someone on a particular issue and then strongly disagree with them on another without hate taking over. I'm thankful for the Fine for Signs law and the removed signs it is responsible for removing. Kendall County responded and brought their signage in compliance based on the law and AG's opinions without me having to file a formal complaint.
:iagree:

Return to “RIP - Fines for Signs”