TexasCHLforum.com

TexasJohnBoy wrote:For those curious:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

v7a wrote:

TexasJohnBoy wrote:They used a rule where 25 members can vote/sign/something and end all debate and amendments and force a vote immediately.

Huh? Why wasn't this rule taken advantage of earlier in the day?

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Okay, now I can say a little more about the Rep. Zerwas amendment. Even with the Amendment, it decriminalizes campus-carry. While it is a version of opt-out, it does require a 2/3 vote of the Board of Regents and it cannot be the entire campus. I can't get into why at this point.

Now to the Senate, after 3rd reading, where the addition of private institutions is a problem.

Chas.

safety1 wrote:Can anyone explain what happened??? I froze up on the feed right at the big moment.
How did that happen? it was like the Dems just rolled over. What the what???

casp625 wrote:

v7a wrote:So how many amendments passed and what were they? Is there going to be enough time left for conference to strip them out and then concurrence vote?

Amendment 1 passed... allowing an "opt out" of public universities with 2/3 concurrence from the university. HOWEVER, they have to opt-out of certain locations on the campus, not the entire campus.

Winchster wrote:

Jasonw560 wrote:

cprems wrote:
A special session s in order

If I were Gov., this would be Straus Triple Dawg Daring for a special session.

There is always hope