My apologies, VMI77. I meant section 2. It requires that deadly force be reasonably necessary to prevent the acts listed in section 2(A).VMI77 wrote:
That belief is required under (B), preventing escape with the property, and is preceded from the previous part with "or." So, it reads...deadly force against another is justified....to prevent imminent commission of.....robbery, aggravated robbery.....OR, to prevent escape, IF 3.A or 3.B. These sections refer back to 9.41, 9.32, and 9.31. 9.31 and 9.32 also list robbery and aggravated robbery as justifications for the use of deadly force.
I'm not trying to mix apples and oranges. The apples and oranges are already mixed. What I'm saying is that we have to be aware of that and act accordingly.
I understand what the law says, but Texas law isn't necessarily the law in other jurisdictions. Again, I was offering a general mindset that applies in virtually every jurisdiction of the Unites States. If you disagree with that, I respect your opinion, but there's no need for us to argue about it.
Have a nice day, and hopefully we will never have to apply these ideas in the real world.