TexasCHLforum.com

I would be wary of a late-breaking change that alleges to remove the criminal penalty in exchange for weakening the sign requirement. Specifically, I would be wary that other sections of the law could used to criminally penalize going past a sign, which is what I think some previous posters were bringing up or asking questions about.

If TSRA/Charles examines the changes and gives a , then OK, but short of that, I'd say this bill needs to stop.

It would be fun to see an bill that started out trying to make things difficult for CHL'ers turned into a positive 2A step forward, tho.

Called everyone except the bill author. The man answering for Rep Wray said Wray is opposed. None of the others said one way or the other.