Juries seem to be much more understanding though: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/j ... -1.1365975Skiprr wrote:Seriously?miljet wrote:I always figured that I wasn't the one who decided his life was only worth a television, he made that decision when he decided to steal one.I don't own anything that I'd be willing to take a life over.
And you actually possess a Texas License to Carry?
Get some schoolin' my friend. Take some defensive shooting courses, read Mas Ayoob, attend one of Charles Cotton's seminars.
Your understanding of use of deadly force is very much lacking.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “What would you do?”
- Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:10 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: What would you do?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 16020
Re: What would you do?
- Sun Mar 26, 2017 9:26 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: What would you do?
- Replies: 44
- Views: 16020
Re: What would you do?
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.