TexasCHLforum.com

TresHuevos wrote:

gljjt wrote:

Russell wrote:

gljjt wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote:Was a little disheartened to read the email update from TSRA this morning.....
HB560 is listed as their #5 priority.

Hoping that's high enough to push it through.

I appreciate the politics of LTC fee reduction in the #1 spot, but was hoping to see 560 as priority #2.

I suspect that HB560 is higher than #5 on the TSRA priority list, but is listed as #5 for other reasons.

For all the folks that seem to feel that Constitutional Carry is the top priority of the decade and are therefor using every single ounce of political capital to push it?

Yep. Keep them happy, off the protest circuit and out of capital offices. Reduce the negative publicity that some can and have brought out in the past. Meanwhile, hopefully HB560 works its way through the system.

I would be very happy with a ninja style legislative maneuver on HB560. It just needs to get through. Period.

Russell wrote:

gljjt wrote:

RoyGBiv wrote:Was a little disheartened to read the email update from TSRA this morning.....
HB560 is listed as their #5 priority.

Hoping that's high enough to push it through.

I appreciate the politics of LTC fee reduction in the #1 spot, but was hoping to see 560 as priority #2.

I suspect that HB560 is higher than #5 on the TSRA priority list, but is listed as #5 for other reasons.

For all the folks that seem to feel that Constitutional Carry is the top priority of the decade and are therefor using every single ounce of political capital to push it?

RoyGBiv wrote:Was a little disheartened to read the email update from TSRA this morning.....
HB560 is listed as their #5 priority.

Hoping that's high enough to push it through.

I appreciate the politics of LTC fee reduction in the #1 spot, but was hoping to see 560 as priority #2.