Got it. Thanks.ScottDLS wrote:If otherwise off limits under 46.03 or 46.035 city owned premises can post 30.06. Example: City owned Hospital.gljjt wrote:What am I missing? Even if it is amusement park, since it is owned the City of Dallas, it is not off limits for carry. The sign is irrelevant.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “"Dallas Zoo could be headed for legal showdown over ‘no guns’ signs"”
- Wed Nov 04, 2015 7:52 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: "Dallas Zoo could be headed for legal showdown over ‘no guns’ signs"
- Replies: 35
- Views: 5828
Re: "Dallas Zoo could be headed for legal showdown over ‘no guns’ signs"
- Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:16 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: "Dallas Zoo could be headed for legal showdown over ‘no guns’ signs"
- Replies: 35
- Views: 5828
Re: "Dallas Zoo could be headed for legal showdown over ‘no guns’ signs"
What am I missing? Even if it is amusement park, since it is owned the City of Dallas, it is not off limits for carry. The sign is irrelevant.