If you want to get picky, this sign is not compliant. It is missing a comma as compared to the penal code, section 30.06.Keith B wrote:Sorry, no. The requirement lines are separate (i) and (ii), so it does not require English in one color and Spanish in another.rivertripper wrote:If you see a "real" 30.06 sign it is the lettering that is contrasting
as between English and Spanish, generally the English in one color
and the Spanish in the other
The statute calls for a "sign posted on the property that...
includes the language described in paragraph a...
in both English and Spanish...
and appears in contrasting colors...
block letters...
at least one inch in height...
is displayed in a conspicuous manner...
clearly visible to the public
Below is a valid 30.06 sign(B) a sign posted on the property that:
(i) includes the language described by
Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;
(ii) appears in contrasting colors with
block letters at least one inch in height; and
(iii) is displayed in a conspicuous manner
clearly visible to the public.
[ Image ]
Search found 1 match
Return to “Is this 30.06 sign posted at Wholefoods compliant?”
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:51 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Is this 30.06 sign posted at Wholefoods compliant?
- Replies: 108
- Views: 20415