Search found 2 matches

by mr1337
Fri Aug 05, 2016 10:20 am
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
Replies: 128
Views: 52615

Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry

srothstein wrote:I fully support Charles statement and the removal of all off-limits areas. But I honestly do not think that will happen. I will be very happy to see 46.035 repealed this year. I would like to see 46.15 modified as well to see LTCs exempted like peace officers, but I don't see it happening this session. We should be able to get it through within a few years though.

I also do not see too many changes in 30.06/07 getting through this year. I would not argue with a few there, but I really do not see it happening.

If we can just get 46.035 repealed this session with no steps backwards in other areas, I count it as a winning year.
I'd support 46.035 being repealed, even if we couldn't get courthouses, racetracks, and polling places, leaving those for another session.

I don't know the likelihood of getting one or both, but even just getting 46.035 would greatly improve 2nd Amendment rights for the majority of LTC holders. Dallas & FW Zoo arguments about being a theme park or educational institution would be moot. People would be able to see a show at a 51% location downtown on a weekend night without forfeiting their right of self-preservation, and we could get rid of the unnecessary double enforcement of hospitals and religious places.
by mr1337
Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:00 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
Replies: 128
Views: 52615

Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry

TXBO wrote:John Lott has done several studies relating the number of concealed carry holders with cost and ease of obtaining a permit. I'd like to see a priority on increasing the law abiding armed population of Texas by simplifying and reducing the cost of permits.
Senator Huffman (State Affairs chairwoman) has already voiced support for reducing the LTC fees. Currently, it generates revenue for the state. She knows that it should not.

Return to “Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry”