TexasCHLforum.com

Oldgringo wrote:

Glockster wrote:

TVGuy wrote:I seem to remember hearing MDA people saying they would be doing this.

Since a 30.07 sign is something that has the force of law behind it, sounds like a nice thing to add to the code next session - a prohibition against unauthorized placement or tampering.

I would think that would already be against a law of some sort?

No clue on my end but I don't see anything in that section of the code that contains any language like that. But whether that would be covered under something else is above my pay grade.

TVGuy wrote:I seem to remember hearing MDA people saying they would be doing this.

Since a 30.07 sign is something that has the force of law behind it, sounds like a nice thing to add to the code next session - a prohibition against unauthorized placement or tampering.