Search found 2 matches

by CleverNickname
Sat Aug 06, 2016 12:33 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
Replies: 128
Views: 52648

Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry

EastTexasRancher wrote:It's my opinion that if the business takes away my right to defend myself, then they're assuming that responsibility. And if they fail to do so, they can be held liable. And that should include employers!!!!!!!
I agree, if you're forced to go on property where it's illegal for you to carry, then the owner of the property should assume liability.

However, you're not forced to work at any particular place, nor are you forced to frequent any particular business. So I guess the only place that would assume liability under such a law would be a city or county who called you to jury duty, forcing you to enter a court unarmed.
by CleverNickname
Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:50 pm
Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
Replies: 128
Views: 52648

Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry

rotor wrote:To be honest, I don't know that I support constitutional carry if that means anyone that can own a gun in Texas can carry concealed or open.
There's a number of states where unlicensed open carry is legal, and a number where unlicensed concealed carry is also legal. None of those states have had any major problems. Show some stats to back up your feelings if you think you're correct.

Or do you think that the character of Texans is markedly inferior to those of residents of other states?

Return to “Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry”