Search found 5 matches

by anygunanywhere
Tue Mar 04, 2014 1:44 pm
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife
Replies: 89
Views: 33275

Re: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife

The state cannot guarantee your safety 100%.

We cannot guarantee our safety 100% either, but at least we can be 100% responsible for it.

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Tue Mar 04, 2014 12:46 pm
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife
Replies: 89
Views: 33275

Re: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife

AlaskanInTexas wrote:My thoughts on the subjects at hand:

1. I see nothing offensive about having non-statutory rules in public buildings. You really want them to have to pass a law each and every time a local building sees a need to be addressed? If they don't want knives, fine. If they don't want you rolling in with a large pizza, fine. If they don't want you playing music from a boombox, fine.

2. I am pretty much on board with the any gun anywhere camp, but not in courts. BAD IDEA. You want some witness to a crime to be testifying knowing that the perps buddies are all sitting there armed? You want a judge to give out an impartial ruling knowing that it will incite powerful emotions in people that are armed? You want families of perps and victims to be sitted across the aisle armed? You want families of victims to be sitting there ready to take charge when the jury doesn't see things as they do. Courtrooms can be rendered relatively safe; I think disarming all is a good trade off here.
Well, the judges, DAs, and LEOs on duty can protect us all then. Their right to defend themselves is much more important than ours.

We will never be able to control others. This is what makes gun free zones killing fields.


I understand your stances, I just don't agree.

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Mon Mar 03, 2014 7:38 pm
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife
Replies: 89
Views: 33275

Re: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife

texanjoker wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
SewTexas wrote:I don't see how a cell phone with a camera can be banned from a building, from a courtROOM sure, but not from the building itself. that's simply nuts.
Judges have wide latitude to control their courtrooms. They can throw out cameras. They can throw out people.

Frankly I want a courthouse with incredible security. Any court with criminal proceedings, or far worse family proceedings, is a potential warzone with emotion driving.
Yeah, we wouldn't want all those unstable CHLs from carrying in a courthouse would we?

Anygunanywhere
If its family court, no I wouldn't.
OK, you do not have to if you decide not to, Your option.

Emotions can run high pretty much anyplace and anytime. Emotions can run high in the checkout line of Wally World. If someone is not stable enough to carry, it makes no difference where they are at the time.

CHLs should be allowed to carry wherever LEOs can carry.

Anygunanywhere

off duty leo's on personal business are not allowed to carry in the Travis County courthouse
OK. That does not make my statement irrelevant. That is the Travis County courthouse. Lots of places that CHL are forbidden to carry that all LEO are given a pass.

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Mon Mar 03, 2014 3:53 pm
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife
Replies: 89
Views: 33275

Re: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
Cedar Park Dad wrote:
SewTexas wrote:I don't see how a cell phone with a camera can be banned from a building, from a courtROOM sure, but not from the building itself. that's simply nuts.
Judges have wide latitude to control their courtrooms. They can throw out cameras. They can throw out people.

Frankly I want a courthouse with incredible security. Any court with criminal proceedings, or far worse family proceedings, is a potential warzone with emotion driving.
Yeah, we wouldn't want all those unstable CHLs from carrying in a courthouse would we?

Anygunanywhere
If its family court, no I wouldn't.
OK, you do not have to if you decide not to, Your option.

Emotions can run high pretty much anyplace and anytime. Emotions can run high in the checkout line of Wally World. If someone is not stable enough to carry, it makes no difference where they are at the time.

CHLs should be allowed to carry wherever LEOs can carry.

Anygunanywhere
by anygunanywhere
Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:33 pm
Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
Topic: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife
Replies: 89
Views: 33275

Re: Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
SewTexas wrote:I don't see how a cell phone with a camera can be banned from a building, from a courtROOM sure, but not from the building itself. that's simply nuts.
Judges have wide latitude to control their courtrooms. They can throw out cameras. They can throw out people.

Frankly I want a courthouse with incredible security. Any court with criminal proceedings, or far worse family proceedings, is a potential warzone with emotion driving.
Yeah, we wouldn't want all those unstable CHLs from carrying a=in a courthouse would we?

Anygunanywhere

Return to “Denied Rigth To Vote...For Carrying Pocket Knife”