TexasCHLforum.com

92f-fan wrote:

mr surveyor wrote:The 1991 Pinatubo eruption probably spewed more pollutants into the atmosphere in one belch than all of man's internal combustion engines since the 1890's. And we really think that we're in control?
JD

Great example of my view of the issue

Another view might be - lets assume that humans have devastated the environment, and greenhouse worst case scenarios are going to happen sooner than later... How is making the few people in the US and UK pay Carbon Taxes going to fix it ?
Where does that $$ go ? How will it change the impact that China, India and other developing countries are having ?

philip964 wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/09 ... hing-less/

Big march brings out the cooks.

myntalfloss wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:BTW, 246 record low temperatures set first 10 days of September.


http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/12/there ... l-warming/

Anygunanywhere

Try to think macro rather than micro.

There are always abberations in data. You can't cherry-pick. Just because you had a relative that smoked until they turned 90 doesn't mean that tobacco isn't bad for you.

97-98% of the REAL scientists that study climate think that the earth is getting warmer and that the science is settled. If you went to 100 doctors and 98 of them said that you have cancer and 2 of them said, "Nah, you're good to go" , what would you do? I don't know about you, but I'd take the chemo.

You're always going to be able to find an echo chamber blog somewhere that will support your misconceptions. But, quoting Neal DeGrasse Tyson, "The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. "

Here's a couple to start you out.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... ge-report/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline ... -of-doubt/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;