Return to “OCT: Proposed OC ACT for 2015”
I'd support full auto for the short period of time until the Wife saw the ammo bill and provided a free attitude adjustment. Once I made it out of the hospital and long term rehab I'd probably sing a different tune...srothstein wrote:Some on the board may support much broader rights than others. Some support open carry even if they do not do it. Some support full-auto possession, even if they would never do it. .rotor wrote:Isn't it all 2nd ammendment rights?
Er what? What are you trying to say? If a poster complaining on a CHL board about CHLers being the most vocal on the board, wouldn't that be...er logical?rotor wrote:Isn't it all 2nd ammendment rights?Cedar Park Dad wrote:Strangely, a board called CHL forum, about CHL issues might have a preponderence of members who are CHLers replying on threads here.rotor wrote: From so many of the threads on this site it almost appears that the CHL people are the ones most upset about open carry.
Is it trying to repeal CHLs? It repeals the exemption of CHLs from 46.02, which is unlawful carrying of weapons.G.A. Heath wrote:Am I the only one who noticed Section 11 of this bill and realizes what it does?
Strangely, a board called CHL forum, about CHL issues might have a preponderence of members who are CHLers replying on threads here.rotor wrote: From so many of the threads on this site it almost appears that the CHL people are the ones most upset about open carry.
G.A. Heath wrote:The Blue Sign is required for business that sell alcohol but do not meet the requirement to post the 51% sign.MeMelYup wrote:Olive Garden along with several other Restaurants I have observed the blue sign.
Brilliant!Beiruty wrote:I would suggest small bills to accomplish the goal.Right2Carry wrote:I support the choice to open carry but do not support the tactics that are being used by some of the OC folks. I would rather see legislation passed that gives CHLers the right to carry everywhere a LEO can carry passed then OC passing.
1) OC option for CHLers
2) CHLer carry where LEO can.
3) Reduce Fees for new CHLer so OC supporters can join
Even though, I do support constitutional 2ndA, carrying in the public where there is potential for more conflicts and interaction with other strange people/events.
I still value,
A) The CHL course (laws of use of deadly weapon and deescalation)
B) The shooting qualification
C) The more training that comes with the responsibility of carrying a deadly weapon.
I'd vote against that, like instantly.Beiruty wrote:It was just posted on OCT fb.
By CJ Grisham:Doc of proposed act is attached:This is the legislation that Open Carry Texas is sponsoring to get open carry passed in Texas. It accomplishes several goals: legalizing the open carry of ALL firearms; removing exemptions of where off-duty officers, legislators, judges, prosecutors, etc can carry (If a citizen can't carry to a particular place, neither can anyone else); clarifies the disorderly conduct statute to ensure that open carry in and of itself isn't an arrestable offense; removes TABC laws that bar people from carrying into establishments that sell alcohol (for example, I do NOT drink at all and should be able to defend myself while eating at the Olive Garden in spite of the fact they sell alcohol); removes restrictions on types of knives that can legally be carried; and enjoins state agencies with municipalities under state pre-emption of firearms regulation (in other words, DPS can't just decide to ban the bearing of firearms on capitol grounds). Please contact your state senator and representative and ask them to support this legislation.