mr1337 wrote:Constitutional carry would not do away with our LTC program. We can still feel "special" while still respecting the rights of others.
The 2nd Amendment says "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." (Emphasis mine) This clearly states that the bearing of arms is not to be infringed upon. The requirement of a license is an infringement. You need to take a class $60-100, spending 4-6 hours, then submit fingerprints (which is another $10 or so, isn't it?), and submit a $140 fee to the state government. Then, you wait 30-90 days for them to give you permission to do something that was your right all along.
Most people are not going to go through all that. Some people don't have the time or the money. They're just going to forfeit their right to bear arms.
Criminals don't care about licensing. They're going to carry regardless so they have the upper hand in an assault, robbery, rape, or murder.
Why should the law-abiding be neutered for the benefit of the criminals?
Rights you have to ask permission for are not rights. They are privileges. (See my signature.)
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one." -- Cesare Beccaria (later quoted by Thomas Jefferson)
If there was anything remotely like this put on right to vote it would be like opening a can of worms. Heck most places you can't even be ask to show photo ID to prove you are who you claim you are because it would be infringing on your right to vote. So why isn't jumping through the hoops to get LTC infringing on your rights to have and bare arms? Looks they should both be the same.