There probably isn't enough evidence to prove that he lied, but there is enough to cast doubt on the complete veracity of the evidence he provided which resulted in the conviction.Jason Todd wrote: ↑Tue Apr 02, 2019 3:12 pm They're setting aside convictions based on his false testimony. When will they prosecute him for perjury?
Two different standards. Sometimes justice is delayed until the perpetrator of the crime meets his maker.