Search found 1 match

by wheelgun1958
Mon Dec 20, 2010 2:15 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule
Replies: 278
Views: 136537

Re: Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
C-dub wrote:Sorry, but I'm still confused. There is a much higher probability of me having to defend myself in a post office than spotting an eight point buck. So, switching "incident to" to "necessary for" still doesn't work for me.
The only things you are going to legally do in a Post Office is 1) buy postage; 2) ship something; or 3) check your post office box. (Yeah, I'm leaving out other postal activities like certified mail, etc.) Carrying a handgun is not "incident to" or "necessary for" any activity you are going to do in the Post Office.

Does this help?

Chas.
Other that self-defense. It may not be an 'activity' but a weapon is 'incident to' self-defense.

Return to “Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule”