Nothing is stopping them from retaking the CHL class if they feel the need to. Some of us keep up with the law changes, shoot regularly, and have no need to sit in on an official class. No need to force a renewal class on others. If the laws change, you don't keep up with them, and you break them, tough.Salty1 wrote:I have spoken with many CHL holders who wish they did not remove the renewal training requirement. Unless every CHL holder stays on top of new legislation they have no idea of what changes have been made and the renewal classes provided this information. CHL instructors are looking for new ways to generate revenues since the removal of mandatory renewal training has gone away. The prices of CHL classes has dropped so those who own their own facilities and ranges need to replace that revenue stream. Personally I would have no issues if renewal training came back and I am not an instructor.mr1337 wrote:This firearm instructor wants to bring back the class for renewals. His business must be hurting from when the requirement was removed.
Search found 1 match
Return to “HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now”
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:20 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 42094