"Why not do away with the photos & card completely? Have the CHL be an endorsement on your DL. "
1. There are some things you can lose your DL over that would not effect the CHL. Too many tickets, no insurance, etc.
2. Now that you have to show your DL to go to the bathroom, having GUN written across the face of the licensewould cause some people to become incontinent when they saw it and pose a public health problem.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Changes to CHL law”
- Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:06 pm
- Forum: Goals for 2007
- Topic: Changes to CHL law
- Replies: 37
- Views: 33060
- Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:36 pm
- Forum: Goals for 2007
- Topic: Changes to CHL law
- Replies: 37
- Views: 33060
Changes to CHL law
I see where HB 225 has already been filed to lengthen the CHL from 4 years to 5. I don't agree with that change because I believe people need a refresher at least every couple of legislative sessions.
I would support lowering the cost of the CHL for new and renewal, requiring DPS to take the photos on the existing drivers license equipment, doing away with the USELESS notarized forms, removing the USELESS requirement for "non-violent dispute resolution training" and lowering the course to 7 hours total.
Also, the lack of a "51%" sign should be a defense to prosecution for unknowingly entering a "bar".
That's a start on things.
I would support lowering the cost of the CHL for new and renewal, requiring DPS to take the photos on the existing drivers license equipment, doing away with the USELESS notarized forms, removing the USELESS requirement for "non-violent dispute resolution training" and lowering the course to 7 hours total.
Also, the lack of a "51%" sign should be a defense to prosecution for unknowingly entering a "bar".
That's a start on things.