TexasCHLforum.com

cb1000rider wrote:

txglock21 wrote: They have never had to defend anyone because CHL holders don't get in trouble to need their services.

Have you heard their spiel? They argue just the opposite.

cb1000rider wrote:

jbarn wrote: [pre-paid legal] membership would have afforded him no cost legal representation.

That's what they say. At least that's what their commissioned non-attorney sales people say.
What I want to see:
1) References to actual cases where they have defended clients. To date, they haven't provided this.
2) Actual "zero cost" clients who are willing to be references.

[pre-paid legal] cites "privacy" when indicating that they don't have any case references. That's fine, but cases are matters of public record. And dispositions of those cases should be of great interest to anyone who considers this to a form of legal representation.

And sorry, the math doesn't work out for me. If I'm a defendant in a criminal trial, I want the best attorney I can afford. Assigning me an attorney that gets paid some % of several membership fees - is he or she really going to be motivated to work hard?

Just askin...