TexasCHLforum.com

louisf1

Okay I was a bit disturbed there for a few minutes. I see the part that require 30:06 / 30:07 notification now.

louisf1

AJSully421 wrote:
louisf1 wrote:
jmra wrote:
mulfjohn wrote:
Yee haaaaaw. It finally passed. Thanks to all that had input in this cause and thanks to the legislatures that pushed it through the house and Senate. Without their dedication and will power,we wouldn't have the option to choose between oc or not. Also the changing of the 30.06 penalty is awesome. Keep up the good work.
I'm more excited about the change in the penalty and the fact that on Jan 1 all existing 30.06 signs have incorrect wording than I am about open carry itself.

How do all 30:06 signs have improper wording? Was there a change to the wording?

Yep.

I may be wrong but it looks like they snuck in some other areas making churches and religious facilities off limits. Also looks like amusement parks are off limits without regard to the population of the city it's located in. See page 34 and 35 of the conference report. Tell me I'm wrong.

louisf1

jmra wrote:
mulfjohn wrote:
Yee haaaaaw. It finally passed. Thanks to all that had input in this cause and thanks to the legislatures that pushed it through the house and Senate. Without their dedication and will power,we wouldn't have the option to choose between oc or not. Also the changing of the 30.06 penalty is awesome. Keep up the good work.
I'm more excited about the change in the penalty and the fact that on Jan 1 all existing 30.06 signs have incorrect wording than I am about open carry itself.

How do all 30:06 signs have improper wording? Was there a change to the wording?

louisf1

ralewis wrote:
CoffeeNut wrote:Now a quick question: Is it HB910 that postpones OC until Jan 1 2016 or can we OC in September?
I think "open carry" is 1 Jan '16, but what about the 30.06 amendment? That was different section of the Penal Code wasn't it? Or is it the entirety of what was passed delayed until 1 Jan?

The entire bill becomes effective 1 Jan 2016 as long as Governor Abbott does not us his veto power. I do believe he has already stated that he will sign it if it makes it to his desk. Well it is now on the way to his desk.

louisf1

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
louisf1 wrote:
DanD wrote:A truly amazing past 30 minutes. Truly amazing.
What is truly amazing is that walking past a 30:06 sign unintentionally is now going to be a class C misdemeanor.
This is more valuable than open-carry, in my view. 850,000+ CHL benefit from this protection from accidentally entering posted property.

Chas.

Yes Sir, I agree with you. I also like the fact that if my shirt happens to blow up or I bend over wrong that I am not going to be breaking the law. I don't believe I will openly carry but I will feel much more relaxed knowing that it no longer matters if it is seen.

louisf1

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
sig-sog wrote:So, HB910 has passed in both chambers? And it goes to the Governor right? Or is there more to come?
It goes to the Governor.

Chas.

Excellent work Sir!! Thank you for your untiring support and dedication to the second.

louisf1

DanD wrote:A truly amazing past 30 minutes. Truly amazing.

What is truly amazing is that walking past a 30:06 sign unintentionally is now going to be a class C misdemeanor.

louisf1

casp625 wrote:
ELIGIBLE AT 7:40 PM MAY 29, 2015:
HB 910 Phillips / Flynn / White, James / Riddle / Guillen / et al.
Relating to the authority of a person who is licensed to carry a handgun to openly carry a holstered handgun; creating criminal offenses.

That's on the house side. Senate has not distributed the committee notes yet.

TexasCHLforum.com

Search found 8 matches

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee