dale blanker, you folks think you're rather amusing, don't you? Think you've won some major victory? Well, there is a thing called counting your chickens before they've hatched. You really shouldn't do such things, you might find yourself not so happy later.dale blanker wrote:What is really unfortunate about the quote is the timing of it - not what the grieving pastor's family and other victims' families needed to hear now. I don't think the comment was malicious but maybe thoughtless and tacky. Charles must have thought this and hence the removal.baldeagle wrote:Only Charles can answer your question, but I can tell you this. In the current climate in America, you don't have to say anything wrong to be assaulted on the internet. All you have to do is say something that people disagree with. What Charles said was that the Pastor opposed carry in churches, which is a fact, and some of the dead could be alive if carry had been allowed in the church, which is also a fact.EHooper02 wrote:I really only have one question:
If what he said wasn't wrong, why has it been deleted and you have been left to defend his statement?
Understand your board is probably under a lot of fire right now, and I'm certainly not trying to add to that. Just something to think about, I feel.
What is not a fact is that Charles blamed the victims for their deaths. That is a blatant misrepresentation of what he said. It's not surprising. It happens on both sides of the political aisle by people who don't care about truth but only care about promoting their own agendas.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Church shooting Charleston SC”
- Sat Jun 20, 2015 1:18 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Church shooting Charleston SC
- Replies: 200
- Views: 109585
Re: Church shooting Charleston SC
EDITED TO CLARIFY WHO WAS BEING ADDRESSED