TexasCHLforum.com

ScottDLS wrote:

rotor wrote:

Tylerscott20 wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:In the end, they can pass all the laws they want, banning all the guns they want, and then eventually they have to come take them.

The logistics required to do that would make any government's head spin. Can you imagine being sent to disarm a populace that has more weapons than you? Yup, me neither.

The slow erosion of the second amendment by the media's spin of what the "public's" opinion on guns are is the real threat. But even that is backfiring for the left.

The problem of course would be that it would be American boys wearing the uniform who are essentially good kids that would be on the front line of this assault and they would either not follow those orders or would follow them and would be shooting fellow Americans. Killing Americans was not a problem for the government in Waco. Men, women and children. Very scary thoughts.

This is all the reason for the "slow roll" gun control. Just a few "common sense" gun control measures, mind you. Connecticut and New York have already started. In CT you have to register your "assault weapons" and "big clips". In NY with the SAFE Act, you had to get rid of them or destroy them. Oh...lots of people didn't, but they are now felons in waiting, like you guys who drive through school zones with an OOS license.

And don't forget, the privileged few with NY handgun licenses...first are you going to risk yours by having >10 mags lying around? Or illegal rifles (i.e. pistol grip and detachable magazines. So when it comes time to "come and take them" you're on the list. What if they mail you a "turn in order" ? Oh you're a MD in NY, like my BIL from Texas...well unless you're going to go the local, police academy like him, and also get sworn in as a Fed, you better turn 'em in. Otherwise, good luck practicing medicine? CDL's, you're next.

You think the "Constitutional Carry" people are nuts? Well good thing they have your prints on file and your address...

Who "needs" a bump stock anyway? How about >10rd mags aka massive murdering death clips, c'mon you don't need them. They were already illegal to make from 1994-2004. Banning full auto's they snuck into the Firearm Owners PROTECTION Act 30 years ago.

The answer to EVERY "common sense" measure is NO. NO Federal involvement NONE. No compromise, no reasonable review of regulations on rubber bands and paper clips. No NRA giving "a little" for the sake of public opinion. Regardless of trying to sound reasonable, NRA will always be demonized by the left, so don't waste effort.

No more Elmer Fudd Cornyns and Gentleman Hunter Paul Ryans! Forget those RINOs!

NO!!!

Tylerscott20 wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:In the end, they can pass all the laws they want, banning all the guns they want, and then eventually they have to come take them.

The logistics required to do that would make any government's head spin. Can you imagine being sent to disarm a populace that has more weapons than you? Yup, me neither.

The slow erosion of the second amendment by the media's spin of what the "public's" opinion on guns are is the real threat. But even that is backfiring for the left.

Acronym Esq wrote: We have no reason to fear our government.
acronym 10/14/2017 10:43 AM