Yes and not many folks know about it. I'd like to add that if you buy or transfer more than one handgun or any combination thereof. According to what our inspector told us, the form is is not digitized and not searchable by the ATF but if your name comes up, they they can pull your file.OldCannon wrote:BTW, this rule has ALWAYS been in place for handguns (well, ever since the GCA). If you buy two or more handguns of ANY type within the space of seven days, it gets reported to the ATF in the same manner.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Court upholds rifle sales reporting requirement”
- Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:30 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Court upholds rifle sales reporting requirement
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6014
Re: Court upholds rifle sales reporting requirement
- Tue Jun 04, 2013 5:12 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Court upholds rifle sales reporting requirement
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6014
Re: Court upholds rifle sales reporting requirement
tomneal wrote:
Reporting applys to multi-packs of AR15 lower receivers
On the other hand...
I thought there were multiple court cases, that would go to at least 2 different Courts of Appeal.
All the cases aren't complete, are they?
I have heard of one case where an IOI was telling FFL dealers this. Our inspector was very specific in the fact hat it had to be a full rifle. This form specifically calls out reporting semi-automatic rifles larger than .22. The form in question is the ATF E-Form 3310.12
This form is to be used by licensees to report all transactions in which an unlicensed person acquired, at one time or during five consecutive business days, two or more
semi-automatic rifles larger than .22 caliber (including .223/5.56 caliber) with the ability to accept a detachable magazine. This form is not required when the rifles are
returned to the same person from whom they are received.