When I first read that, I thought, "Oh well, at least we can still have C-4 and tactical nukes."
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Senate To Go After Some Handguns”
- Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:28 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Senate To Go After Some Handguns
- Replies: 71
- Views: 9811
Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns
What's up with the whole "grenade launcher" thing? Is it just hyperbole?
When I first read that, I thought, "Oh well, at least we can still have C-4 and tactical nukes."
When I first read that, I thought, "Oh well, at least we can still have C-4 and tactical nukes."
- Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:17 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Senate To Go After Some Handguns
- Replies: 71
- Views: 9811
Re: Senate To Go After Some Handguns
What a bunch of hogwash! It won't pass in this form. I think the registration thing is just a red-herring designed to look like a compromise when it comes to negotiations. Even an idiot like Feinstein can't hope that will fly.
...and exactly what the hell is a "military characteristic ?" I know the bureaucrats will come up with five hundred pages of definitions about how many whats have to be how many inches away from whatever..., but i reject the whole concept at its bedrock. The 2nd amendment makes no distinction between military and civilian arms, and neither should we.
If the Dims were honest, they'd just draw up a bill to repeal the 2nd amendment. I'd like an amendment to say that you can't enact a law or ordinance that overrides the clear and simple intent of any constitutional provision or amendment without following the constitutional amendment process. We still might end up in Feinstein's police state, but at least we'd deserve it.
Freaking lawyers!
...and exactly what the hell is a "military characteristic ?" I know the bureaucrats will come up with five hundred pages of definitions about how many whats have to be how many inches away from whatever..., but i reject the whole concept at its bedrock. The 2nd amendment makes no distinction between military and civilian arms, and neither should we.
If the Dims were honest, they'd just draw up a bill to repeal the 2nd amendment. I'd like an amendment to say that you can't enact a law or ordinance that overrides the clear and simple intent of any constitutional provision or amendment without following the constitutional amendment process. We still might end up in Feinstein's police state, but at least we'd deserve it.
Freaking lawyers!