This is a training solution that is possible. We have several rules now that require officers with a basic certificate to attend specific training but officers with intermediate, advanced, or master certificates do not have to attend. The difference between the certificates is a combination of time as an officer and education, either college or continuing education credits. The amount of time differs based on the level of education.nonleg wrote:Maybe the junior version of what you suggest is extra training for junior cops. I've met plenty of "seasoned" officers that understand what the rules are, and a *ton* of young ones that don't. I'll directly reference the Houston Rodeo, when a senior cop overruled his newbie in the golfcart with a "You're not going into the arena are you? OK, don't shoot anyone ok."
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry”
- Wed Oct 26, 2016 11:38 am
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
- Replies: 128
- Views: 52763
Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
- Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:23 pm
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
- Replies: 128
- Views: 52763
Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
I fully support Charles statement and the removal of all off-limits areas. But I honestly do not think that will happen. I will be very happy to see 46.035 repealed this year. I would like to see 46.15 modified as well to see LTCs exempted like peace officers, but I don't see it happening this session. We should be able to get it through within a few years though.
I also do not see too many changes in 30.06/07 getting through this year. I would not argue with a few there, but I really do not see it happening.
If we can just get 46.035 repealed this session with no steps backwards in other areas, I count it as a winning year.
I also do not see too many changes in 30.06/07 getting through this year. I would not argue with a few there, but I really do not see it happening.
If we can just get 46.035 repealed this session with no steps backwards in other areas, I count it as a winning year.