TexasCHLforum.com

I could not agree with you more RP, employers need to realize by having anti-chl policies they accomplish little more than to turn their employees into potential victims. While I do understand that some employers need to have such policies in order to be insured, they should not just blindly comply. I am sure there are some pro-gun insurance companies out there and even if they do have to pay a little more isn't the safety of their staff worth it. I'm betting that if the owner had survived this tragic ordeal his first order of business would be to change the company policy.

C-dub wrote:This is why my boss wishes I could carry at work, but it's not up to him.

I believe the death toll would have been much lower if an armed CHL holder were present.

http://www.kvia.com/news/At-least-6-dea ... index.html

A recently laid off employee returns hours later and begins shooting...