Charles stated:
"While HPD is technically correct in that an arrest can be made and the defendant will have to go to court to benefit from the new presumption, to make an arrest under those circumstances is wrong. Why put a person through the system, if you know they are going to be acquitted? The only answer is the hope that the harassment value will keep people from carrying."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bingo...
Nail on the head...
Give that man a cigar...
I've been waiting for someone else to say it...Thanks Chas...
Frustrating isn't it???
I don't think Chuck Rosenthal really buys into it, but somebody must have really tightened the screws on him to come out publically on this issue...
I just got this gut feeling that obviously something or somebody else is pulling the strings on this thing...
Search found 9 matches
- Sat Sep 17, 2005 1:30 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
- Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:54 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
Interesting passage...orc4hire wrote:http://www.godofwar.com/ezekial.wav
- Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:07 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
- Tue Sep 13, 2005 8:03 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
Re: HPD Joins Chuck Rosenthal in Ignoring Legislative Intent
[quote="orc4hire]Let a few cops get sued, a few prosecutors disbarred and/or sent up on criminal charges and they might be a little less frisky in the future.
But the most important thing to remember is that one requirement is that the gun be concealed. If the cop doesn't know it's there, he can't arrest you for carrying it. Keep it hidden and do not volunteer any information. If the HPD choses to operate outside the law, as a criminal gang, they deserve no more respect or cooperation than any other criminals.[/quote]
I would almost say I fall on this side of the discussion...
But then again if this was a reality, then where does that leave us???
Non-CHL'ers running around with firearms in their vehicles believing its ok to do so because there is this law that say they can, but the enforcement side of the coin says "no"???
And no duty to inform L.E., like we are required to do per the law???
And a DA who is determined to make prosecutions against those who mis-interpret the law...
I like Chuck, and I think he does a great job; but I do agree, he has definitely shot himself in the foot with the RKBA community in this area...
But you have to really dig deep inside yourself to truely understand that he may be right about this...I'm sure to catch some heat about this comment, and thats ok...Its just a gut feeling I have, that reinforces my idea that this still may not have been a good law to implement...
But the bottom line of this is that this law does not effect me, it has created some good discussion, I'm either confused, or just don't understand where the good and the bad side of this is just yet...
But the most important thing to remember is that one requirement is that the gun be concealed. If the cop doesn't know it's there, he can't arrest you for carrying it. Keep it hidden and do not volunteer any information. If the HPD choses to operate outside the law, as a criminal gang, they deserve no more respect or cooperation than any other criminals.[/quote]
I would almost say I fall on this side of the discussion...
But then again if this was a reality, then where does that leave us???
Non-CHL'ers running around with firearms in their vehicles believing its ok to do so because there is this law that say they can, but the enforcement side of the coin says "no"???
And no duty to inform L.E., like we are required to do per the law???
And a DA who is determined to make prosecutions against those who mis-interpret the law...
I like Chuck, and I think he does a great job; but I do agree, he has definitely shot himself in the foot with the RKBA community in this area...
But you have to really dig deep inside yourself to truely understand that he may be right about this...I'm sure to catch some heat about this comment, and thats ok...Its just a gut feeling I have, that reinforces my idea that this still may not have been a good law to implement...
But the bottom line of this is that this law does not effect me, it has created some good discussion, I'm either confused, or just don't understand where the good and the bad side of this is just yet...
- Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:49 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
- Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:25 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
- Fri Aug 26, 2005 7:40 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:04 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714
Not that I am being critical...No! Not you Steve!...
Anyway...
Ever notice that you don't hear too much from people who live in States like Vermont...And Alaska (well maybe more from Alaska)...
When issues and questions come up like this???
I never seen anyone who claims to be from, at least Vermont, ever participate in any of these discussions...Not that it would matter...
That just kinda sticks out in my mind right now...
Anyway...
Ever notice that you don't hear too much from people who live in States like Vermont...And Alaska (well maybe more from Alaska)...
When issues and questions come up like this???
I never seen anyone who claims to be from, at least Vermont, ever participate in any of these discussions...Not that it would matter...
That just kinda sticks out in my mind right now...
- Thu Aug 25, 2005 8:01 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New Traveling Law
- Replies: 88
- Views: 15714