TexasCHLforum.com

Pickpocket wrote:

stevie_d_64 wrote: I recall there was a caliber restriction to the small size, nothing less than a .32

The smallest caliber you may qualify with is a .32 - there is no minimum caliber requirement when you carry.

You're right...Thats what it was...

I just never really intended to carry anything smaller than a 9mm anyway, so I didn't ever worry about pushing back that envelope...

Hurts just thinking about it...

Mike1951 wrote:If you travel there, leave your .475's, .480's, and .50's at home.

Not that I'd have a problem with carrying something like these firearms...

But geesh!!! Even for practice...It just cain't be fun to shoot!!! It just cain't!!!

Thats a lot of metal!!!

Seriously???

I recall there was a caliber restriction to the small size, nothing less than a .32

But like some are thinking (so am I) that that has been eliminated...

Going to go check the instant replay...Unless somebody has it ready to cut and paste...

On a side note, there was a sneeky little guy (who shot steel targets at PSC in the 80's and 90's) who used to be able to shoot the gnat off a dogs nose at 100 meters (and not bother the dog), who carried a little .22 derringer for defensive purposes, that I'd feel extremely comfortable being around...

Just because...