TexasCHLforum.com

Paladin wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2019 9:16 am

jason812 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:34 pm

Paladin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 12:12 pm Beto is only polling 2-4% and I think that while his words are a boost for gun-grabbers, they are mostly a childish, desperate cry for attention.

I think it does bring attention to the issue that criminals like Beto should be properly prosecuted and prohibited from running for political office. People who do burglary and drunken hit-and-runs should never be eligible for political office in the first place.

The whole Epstein episode has clearly shown that far too many world leaders are awful human beings making them subject to blackmail and manipulation. Felons should simply not be in political office or hold government positions of any sort.

Irish Bob messed up and openly stated what the lefts true agenda is.

The fake Mexican aside, Rasmussen shows Seventy percent of Democrats favor the idea a mandatory "buyback" of all semi-automatic weapons

Those people do not believe in democracy... they are tyranocrats working towards the next Reign of Terror and boot on the face of humanity forever... they just need our guns first and would do ANYTHING to get them.

The violence demonstrated by antifa and other liberals towards those that disagree with their views shows what will happen to those who question the liberal masters if they ever gain control. The 2nd is what protects all our other freedoms. Once it goes, they all go.

Once our country had young men and women who looked to make the future better for their heirs even at the risk of death. Now, I fear our young are scared to risk their present to make a better future. Maybe it will fall on the elderly who are already facing the end of their future to make a better future for those that come after them.

Up to 25% of the American population fought against the British during the revolution.

https://observer.com/2017/07/soldiers-m ... evolution/

This is the best factual data we have from 1995. It is the infamous 29 Palms questioner.

Firing on U.S. Citizens?

While all of the questions in this survey should have stimulated concern, the survey’s final question has generated an enormous amount of attention:


The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. Consider the following statement: I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government.

The survey results: 42.3 percent strongly disagreed with this statement; 19.3 percent disagreed; 18.6 percent agreed; 7.6 percent strongly agreed; and 12.0 percent had no opinion. In one of the footnotes appearing in his thesis, Cunningham quotes comments placed by some of the Marines next to their answers to this question: "What about the damn Second Amendment? … I feel this is a first in communism! … Read the book None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen." "I would not even consider it. The reason we have guns is so that the people can overthrow the gov’t when or if the people think the gov’t is too powerful." "Freedom to bear arms is our Second Amendment. If you take our Amendments away then you can take this job and stick it where the sun don’t shine! … It is a right to own firearms for defense (2nd Amendment); I would fight for that right!"

Based on the disagreement expressed by 61 percent of the Marines, Cunningham concluded that "a complete unit breakdown would occur in a unit tasked to execute this mission."

http://jpfo.org/articles-assd/29palms-mcmanus.htm