Search found 3 matches

by Jaguar
Mon May 26, 2014 5:35 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Repeal the 30.06 law
Replies: 136
Views: 30789

Re: Repeal the 30.06 law

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Jaguar wrote:
jmra wrote:
gljjt wrote:Repeal of 30.06 would be a "solution" in search of a problem. No likely gain, lots to lose. Bigger fish to fry. IMHO. Which I value highly!
I think changing the penalty to a Class C misdemeanor is a large fish.
I agree, a $4,000 fine, a year in jail, and loss of CHL seems extreme for missing a sign or going in an unposted entrance when another is posted. JMHO
I agree. There's no justification for any jail time for merely entering with a firearm, just as there's no justification for jail time for violation of TPC §46.035(a) (concealment requirement). There are other offenses that can be charged if the firearm is misused in some manner.

These things are doable, it will take work, but it can be done. Stripping private property owners' right and practical ability to bar armed CHLs is, as JMRA noted, just fantasizing.

Chas.
I will be watching for calls to action next legislative session. Just say the word Charles. :thumbs2:
by Jaguar
Mon May 26, 2014 10:40 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Repeal the 30.06 law
Replies: 136
Views: 30789

Re: Repeal the 30.06 law

jmra wrote:
gljjt wrote:Repeal of 30.06 would be a "solution" in search of a problem. No likely gain, lots to lose. Bigger fish to fry. IMHO. Which I value highly!
I think changing the penalty to a Class C misdemeanor is a large fish.
I agree, a $4,000 fine, a year in jail, and loss of CHL seems extreme for missing a sign or going in an unposted entrance when another is posted. JMHO
by Jaguar
Fri May 23, 2014 10:54 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Repeal the 30.06 law
Replies: 136
Views: 30789

Re: Repeal the 30.06 law

Keep 30.06, just strike sections (d) and (e).

Problem solved. :tiphat:

Return to “Repeal the 30.06 law”