I will be watching for calls to action next legislative session. Just say the word Charles.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I agree. There's no justification for any jail time for merely entering with a firearm, just as there's no justification for jail time for violation of TPC §46.035(a) (concealment requirement). There are other offenses that can be charged if the firearm is misused in some manner.Jaguar wrote:I agree, a $4,000 fine, a year in jail, and loss of CHL seems extreme for missing a sign or going in an unposted entrance when another is posted. JMHOjmra wrote:I think changing the penalty to a Class C misdemeanor is a large fish.gljjt wrote:Repeal of 30.06 would be a "solution" in search of a problem. No likely gain, lots to lose. Bigger fish to fry. IMHO. Which I value highly!
These things are doable, it will take work, but it can be done. Stripping private property owners' right and practical ability to bar armed CHLs is, as JMRA noted, just fantasizing.
Chas.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Repeal the 30.06 law”
- Mon May 26, 2014 5:35 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Repeal the 30.06 law
- Replies: 136
- Views: 30789
Re: Repeal the 30.06 law
- Mon May 26, 2014 10:40 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Repeal the 30.06 law
- Replies: 136
- Views: 30789
Re: Repeal the 30.06 law
I agree, a $4,000 fine, a year in jail, and loss of CHL seems extreme for missing a sign or going in an unposted entrance when another is posted. JMHOjmra wrote:I think changing the penalty to a Class C misdemeanor is a large fish.gljjt wrote:Repeal of 30.06 would be a "solution" in search of a problem. No likely gain, lots to lose. Bigger fish to fry. IMHO. Which I value highly!
- Fri May 23, 2014 10:54 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Repeal the 30.06 law
- Replies: 136
- Views: 30789
Re: Repeal the 30.06 law
Keep 30.06, just strike sections (d) and (e).
Problem solved.
Problem solved.