TexasCHLforum.com

couzin wrote:You all do realize that "Buckaroo" has exactly two posts and both are asking pretty serious questions that have provoked some responses that will not get you far in court. Unless Buckaroo comes back online and makes additional comments - there could be a bit of trolling involved here...

for whatever reason he brings an interesting point up for discussion

great post ... is it alright to pass it along?

WildBill wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:But if it does not go well for the defendant to this point and he or she has been unable to convince more knowledgeable people that their actions were justified, then convincing people on the jury will likely be even more difficult.

Most people on a jury believe that the defendant is guilty; otherwise they wouldn't have been arrested and put on trial.

IFMost people on a grand jury believe that the defendant is guilty; otherwise they wouldn't have been arrested and put on trial (people get arrested every day just to have the charges dropped ; been there got a tee shirt)

Notice I didn't quote you, no sense in tying up space. If I am on a football field in the end zone then the distance would be the other end (100 yards) but if I am in the internet cafe then the distance is the front door or a few feet past so you can take your pic.

Like I said out of sight because IF he can see me he can shoot me so the threat of imminent danger is still present. I am not looking for vengeance but I have no reason to give them a second chance if they choose to come back

Sec. 9.32. DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON. (a) A person is justified in using deadly force against another:(1) if the actor would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.31; and(2) when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:(A) to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force; or(B) to prevent the other's imminent commission of aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or aggravated robbery.

show me where it says there is a certain distance when you have to stop or can't shoot someone in the back; it just says you can use deadly force.

If a man robs me with a weapon of any kind I see him as a threat as long as he is in sight so am going to defend myself until I feel safe

There was a case in FL of a man that got robbed and shot the man in the back as he turned and he was a NO BILL and yes I tried to look for a link but with that cafe shooting it’s hard to find