Search found 3 matches
Return to “HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now”
- Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:51 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 41973
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
But... unicorns are FUN.
- Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 41973
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
I have these nasty visions of bermuda shorts...TexasCajun wrote:Why in the world would anyone want to open carry with an ankle holster?Jason K wrote:So....I could actually use an ankle holster as long as there was a dangle-thingy that attached to my belt, right?....Charles L. Cotton wrote:
There are two independent questions/issues: 1) is the gun concealed; and if not 2) is the gun in a shoulder or belt holster? The answer to the concealed question will be no different after passage of open-carry than it has been since 1995. (See below.) The shoulder holster question is easy to answer, as is the belt holster question. If it is attached to or secured by the belt in any manner, then it's a belt holster. This means OWB belt holster, IWB holsters (regardless of placement, i.e. appendix, 3 o'clock, etc.) and even drop-leg holsters (God forbid!!) that are attached to a belt. Whether a gun is concealed is not determined by the type of holster used.
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:59 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 41973
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Other than them wanting it to be so, what makes a classroom "sacred", and how does a gun make it less so?