This cuts both ways.longtooth wrote:With all of the bove.
I OFTEN remember what our own all wise Charles Cotton said about being a test case.
"Those on the cutting edge of law usually bleed to death financially."
Sooner or later there will be a workplace shooting where a firm has banned CHL on their property.
This will open the firm to being sued for creating the conditions that led to the shooting by not allowing people to defend themselves.
This will go to trial and a jury will side with the families of the deceased.
The insurance costs will rise for firms that post signs due not only to the legal liability, but also to the acturarial analyses.