Search found 4 matches
Return to “House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11”
- Wed May 27, 2015 8:53 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
- Replies: 271
- Views: 55231
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Just noticed that one of our local reps, J.D. Sheffield, who ran on a strong 2nd Amendment position and actually co-authored 910, voted nay on the concurrence. He will hear from me.
- Wed May 27, 2015 8:45 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
- Replies: 271
- Views: 55231
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
ANd those reporters, of course, are oblivious to the fact that LEOs are already prevented from making investigatory stops w/o PC, by existing settled case law, with or without the amendment. The amendment changes absolutely nothing. I wonder how many of those opposing LEOs realize that.baseballguy2001 wrote:In my neck of the woods, it's all over the media that "law enforcement" is the main driver behind killing licensed open carry. A headline here -- Police chiefs: Open carry 'handcuffs' law enforcement
- Wed May 27, 2015 6:47 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
- Replies: 271
- Views: 55231
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
I'm just dismayed to the extreme at the utter lack of common sense in this process, as well as some of the selfish, juvenile behavior.
- Wed May 27, 2015 6:03 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
- Replies: 271
- Views: 55231
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
63 ayes, 79 nays. Motion to concur fails.