I don't own a thing chambered in .44 Special, although I do have a few .44 Magnums, albeit none by S&W. The revolver in question is a 27-2, not a 21-2. N-frames chambered for the big-bore rounds really chew up my thumbs, so I stick with Rugers for the heavy-caliber stuff.drjoker wrote:Are you joking, or do you really have a S&W 21-2? Those are exceedingly rare! .44 special right?JSThane wrote:In other words, I -really- need to get a finely hand-tooled rig for my 6" S&W 27-2, and I'll be rated not just a scholar, gentleman, and warrior monk, but also as a philosopher. After all, it holds less ammo than even a 1911!The Annoyed Man wrote:And, when Open Carry goes into effect, if you OC your Glock, you're just another guy with a gun; but when you OC your 1911, you become the cool guy who is both a scholar, gentleman, and warrior monk with a knowledge of fine wine.
And if I'm a philosopher as well, then I'm still free to drink beer, right?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Ruger SR1911 vs Glock 17L”
- Sun May 31, 2015 3:52 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger SR1911 vs Glock 17L
- Replies: 37
- Views: 7053
Re: Ruger SR1911 vs Glock 17L
- Sun May 31, 2015 2:05 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Ruger SR1911 vs Glock 17L
- Replies: 37
- Views: 7053
Re: Ruger SR1911 vs Glock 17L
In other words, I -really- need to get a finely hand-tooled rig for my 6" S&W 27-2, and I'll be rated not just a scholar, gentleman, and warrior monk, but also as a philosopher. After all, it holds less ammo than even a 1911!The Annoyed Man wrote:And, when Open Carry goes into effect, if you OC your Glock, you're just another guy with a gun; but when you OC your 1911, you become the cool guy who is both a scholar, gentleman, and warrior monk with a knowledge of fine wine.
And if I'm a philosopher as well, then I'm still free to drink beer, right?