Far better, I think, to demand all we want and then "compromise" down, instead of proposing what is, ultimately, a compromise already.G.A. Heath wrote:In regards to unlicensed (aka Constitutional) Carry there are many who think there are not the votes in the legislature for it. There is a lot of belief that there are enough votes to pass licensed OC. So the question is do you want legal OC of modern firearms or do you want to demand unlicensed carry?JSThane wrote:I don't think my wife would want to openly carry in a flash-bang, nor would she approve of other women openly carrying in such fashion around me. How about just inserting language clarifying that no license is needed, and rewriting 30.06 to include OC? I'm not terribly upset about the notion of businesses who don't want my money anyway having to reprint signs. It seems that there's a lot of mountains being made out of molehills here, in an attempt to preserve the status quo while rendering said status quo obsolete.MeMelYup wrote:Your going to open carry in a flash bang?mr1337 wrote:I don't understand why HB 164 is defining an unconcealed firearm in that manner. It's limiting it to firearms in a shoulder or belt holster.
What about a car holster? Drop-leg holster? Ankle holster? Smart Carry? MIC holster? Clip draw? Versa Carry? Flash Bang? Shirt Holster/Tactical Shirt?
Not saying I agree with all of these kinds of carry, but there's more to carrying than shoulder and belt holsters.
How about instead of touching 30.06 lets leave it and 30.05 alone and let any sign ban OC and a 30.06 ban licensed CC?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Open Carry Bills 2015”
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:47 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Open Carry Bills 2015
- Replies: 64
- Views: 12169
Re: Open Carry Bills 2015
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:02 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Open Carry Bills 2015
- Replies: 64
- Views: 12169
Re: Open Carry Bills 2015
I don't think my wife would want to openly carry in a flash-bang, nor would she approve of other women openly carrying in such fashion around me. How about just inserting language clarifying that no license is needed, and rewriting 30.06 to include OC? I'm not terribly upset about the notion of businesses who don't want my money anyway having to reprint signs. It seems that there's a lot of mountains being made out of molehills here, in an attempt to preserve the status quo while rendering said status quo obsolete.MeMelYup wrote:Your going to open carry in a flash bang?mr1337 wrote:I don't understand why HB 164 is defining an unconcealed firearm in that manner. It's limiting it to firearms in a shoulder or belt holster.
What about a car holster? Drop-leg holster? Ankle holster? Smart Carry? MIC holster? Clip draw? Versa Carry? Flash Bang? Shirt Holster/Tactical Shirt?
Not saying I agree with all of these kinds of carry, but there's more to carrying than shoulder and belt holsters.