I agree it will be rare. Probably as rare as companies doing random searches of employees' cars.Keith B wrote:Quite a few other states have passed parking lot laws over the past 3-4 years and we haven't heard of issues in those locations. I doubt many, if any, companies will go through that much trouble to try and find a loophole in the law to work around it. Usually after the initial fight, they just go along with the ruling.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Passage of TX Senate Bill 321”
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 8:22 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
- Replies: 73
- Views: 13462
Re: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 7:53 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
- Replies: 73
- Views: 13462
Re: Passage of TX Senate Bill 321
Is that in Texas law somewhere? For example, the security guards at the chemical plants usually are employed by a guard service that places them at the plant. Does that mean they're also employees of the plant and not contract personnel?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Such a persons would not be "contract personnel," they would be "leased employees" and the employer would be subject to SB321.jmra wrote:If I really wanted to be a jerk, as the owner of a corporation, I could start another corporation (with a different address/P.O. Box) that would then employ all of my current employees. The new corporation would then contract labor to my original corporation. All employees at the original site would then be contractors who do not benefit under the new law.
Chas.