Search found 7 matches

by mojo84
Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:57 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...
Replies: 85
Views: 19128

Re: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...

flintknapper wrote:
You pondering has absolutely nothing to do with whether it is or isn't.
Mojo, rather than you following me around exchanging what you now believe to be posts that are 'tit for tat' lets just refrain from engaging one another's ideas. Clearly, there is nothing to be gained by it. You OK with that or not?

Quit making ridiculous comments such as, "you following me around" and some of the other junk you spew and I will have no reason to respond to you.

As long as you advocate creating problems and forcing business owners to put up compliant signs, I will feel compelled to respond. Don't deny it either as I've already shown you a direct quote of you saying that is what you want

If you will drop the insults and innuendo, I will respond accordingly.
by mojo84
Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:45 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...
Replies: 85
Views: 19128

Re: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...

flintknapper wrote:
The problem is, if you/I make it a point to receive verbal notification in place of an invalid sign, there is a strong possibility that the notice you/I receive will be sufficient to prevent any type of carry forever in that establishment for you/I.
Yes Sir, I concede that is a possibility. The likelihood....I don't know, but you might be correct.
Verbal notice is permanent.
Not entirely convinced of this yet, but I am pondering it.
You pondering has absolutely nothing to do with whether it is or isn't.
by mojo84
Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:04 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...
Replies: 85
Views: 19128

Re: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...

flintknapper wrote:
You keep saying they would have to put up compliant signs.
No, I keep saying they would need to put up 'compliant' signs in order to avoid the necessary LEGAL 'next step' of informing.

I don't know how to get you to read with more comprehension? I will endeavor to be abundantly clear.

Thanks,

Flint.
I changed my mind. I'm not going to let the smartelec militant remark go as I am getting fed up with people that want to make themselves feel superior by trying to belittle others.

Is this or is it not a direct quote of you?
If businesses are not challenged/required to place COMPLIANT signs up, then they effectively dictate what is acceptable (not to be confused with legal). If you do not walk past a non-compliant sign and force a verbal or written notice, then the sign thing will continue.
I added some emphasis to help you comprehend some of the dribble you've been spewing. Whether you or anyone else finds this post edifying, I don't care.
by mojo84
Mon Jan 04, 2016 7:54 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...
Replies: 85
Views: 19128

Re: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...

flintknapper wrote:
You keep saying they would have to put up compliant signs.
No, I keep saying they would need to put up 'compliant' signs in order to avoid the necessary LEGAL 'next step' of informing.

I don't know how to get you to read with more comprehension? I will endeavor to be abundantly clear.

Thanks,

Flint.

I'm not going to respond to the insult as I comprehend your attitude and posts just fine.

What you don't seem to comprehend is that they must be okay with the "second step" as you call it. Therefore you are just going to have to deal with it.
by mojo84
Mon Jan 04, 2016 7:41 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...
Replies: 85
Views: 19128

Re: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...

flintknapper wrote:
If one does what you are suggesting, in practicality, what does one gain or accomplish? If you force the issue and they put up a compliant sign, you still won't be able to open carry there.
If they can not be persuaded to 'consider' Open Carry with a thoughtful, well written letter, then they will need to do one of two things.

1. Post a compliant sign....which clearly shows their intent, satisfies the LAW and creates an immediate trespass.
2. Post NO sign or a non-compliant sign and be forced to issue notice either verbally or in writing.

What is potentially "gained" is holding merchants to the same compliance standards we are held to and forcing them to consider IF it is worth it to them. If they are adamant about NO OC ....then nothing is 'lost' except some effort and time on our part. As you say...you still can't open carry there, so your point is somewhat moot in terms of OC. There IS something to be gained, but nothing lost.


You do have something to lose though. They could tell tell that they do not want you in their place of business or tell you that they don't want guns at all.
This is a possibility. So what you are proposing is a 'loss' of C/C, correct? Why would they do that? It puts them right back at 'square one'.
Except NOW they would have to post TWO compliant signs...OR try to figure out WHO was carrying past a non-compliant sign, double the trouble. You really can't see that?

You keep saying they would have to put up compliant signs. No they will not. They can continue to use the noncompliant signs as a warning or heads up and then verbal notice to those that do not honor the sign. There is a strong chance you will be told they don't want guns in their business. You then have been given notice for both concealed and open carry.

Bottom line, you gain nothing in practicality by trying to force the issue. You can get hung up on principle but it gains you nothing.

In reading your posts I get the distinct impression you want it your way without compromise and you want it now. The problem is, there are two different perspectives and you can't for people to see it your way and do it your way. Nothing you've said is going to force someone to put up compliant signs. In other words, you seem to be willing to cut your nose off to spite your face. That's fine but don't screw it up for the rest of us.
by mojo84
Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:26 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...
Replies: 85
Views: 19128

Re: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...

flintknapper wrote:
It's better for me, and for all of us, when seeing an undersized or incorrectly posted 30.07 sign, to obey it as if it were posted validly. Simply walking by an invalid 30.07 sign has a lot more implications than walking past an invalid 30.06 sign (which many of us do on a regular basis).
You're right, improper 30.07 means that they have at least enough knowledge of the law to post something, clearly indicating that they don't want anyone carrying on the premises. Not worth the fight over semantics in my personal opinion. I'll either conceal or go elsewhere.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Disagree, I think this is the worst thing we can do. If businesses are not challenged/required to place COMPLIANT signs up, then they effectively dictate what is acceptable (not to be confused with legal). If you do not walk past a non-compliant sign and force a verbal or written notice, then the sign thing will continue.

IF police are summoned....then it is the perfect time for THEM to explain to the establishment what is required by LAW and if the business refuses to comply (signage)....then they must opt for the Verbal/Written notice. Inconvenient for all involved.

Of course, it goes without saying, be respectful.

If one does what you are suggesting, in practicality, what does one gain or accomplish? If you force the issue and they put up a compliant sign, you still won't be able to open carry there.

You do have something to lose though. They could tell tell that they do not want you in their place of business or tell you that they don't want guns at all.
by mojo84
Sun Jan 03, 2016 7:52 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...
Replies: 85
Views: 19128

Re: Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...

There may be an opportunity for a civil suit if a shop owner could prove up damages from a customer deciding not to enter because of the unauthorized sign. There could be some fun in that also.

Return to “Someone placing 30.07 signs in front of businesses...”