JSThane,
Well said. I hope you'll stick around contribute more in some of our other discussions.
Search found 3 matches
- Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:20 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Interesting
- Replies: 174
- Views: 38281
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:03 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Interesting
- Replies: 174
- Views: 38281
Re: Interesting
And I'm not all that bright.baldeagle wrote:You're too full of yourself. I've confronted your beliefs (and I'm glad you finally admit they are beliefs) with facts and you've sidestepped answering them.EEllis wrote:No but I'm suspicious that he wanted to know so he could try diminish my beliefs without having to bother with confronting those beliefs with logic..jmra wrote:EEllis wrote:Why having trouble shooting down my argument so you want to make a personal attack as to why my argument should be discarded?baldeagle wrote:Well, that's not surprising. Out of curiosity, are you a LEO? Related to a LEO?EEllis wrote:How do you know? You can mind read over the internet????? If an officer swears to the accuracy of a report unless there is something to impeach it I would have to go with it.
If you think that was an attack you're not going to fair very well here.
I asked if you were a LEO or related to a LEO for the reasons that mojo84 articulated, which was apparently obvious since he picked up on it.
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:12 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Interesting
- Replies: 174
- Views: 38281
Re: Interesting
I suspect he is curious because you repeatedly trend to grant search and seizure powers to cops that they do not have. It takes more than just a cop's curiosity or a desire to search someone or to seize a homeowners weapon when the person is not suspected of wrong doing.EEllis wrote:No but I'm suspicious that he wanted to know so he could try diminish my beliefs without having to bother with confronting those beliefs with logic..jmra wrote:EEllis wrote:Why having trouble shooting down my argument so you want to make a personal attack as to why my argument should be discarded?baldeagle wrote:Well, that's not surprising. Out of curiosity, are you a LEO? Related to a LEO?EEllis wrote:How do you know? You can mind read over the internet????? If an officer swears to the accuracy of a report unless there is something to impeach it I would have to go with it.
If you think that was an attack you're not going to fair very well here.